The Five Percent

The five percent


5/1/11, Arts Journal
5/2/11, State of the Planet Q&A
5/24/11, KNews Conversations with Charlie Dyer (podcast)
5/31/11, KVON, interview with Jeff Schechtman
6/8/11, KERA "Think" (podcast)
7/19/11, The Forward "Arty Semite" blog
8/1/11, Jefferson Public Radio, Jefferson Exchange
8/12/11, Huntington News
8/28/11, Startup Professional Musings

8/30/11, ADR Times
9/17/11, The Law Insider
9/20/11, State of the Planet blog, "Our Weatherbeaten Nation"
9/23/11, Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media
9/29/11, Psychology Today
10/3/11, Psychology Today
October, The Negotiator Magazine
10/14/11, Psychology Today
10/24/11, WAMU, The Kojo Nnamdi Show
10/25/11, Psychology Today
10/15/11, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle
10/28/11, ICCR blog
10/18/11, ADR Times
11/7/11, WUWM, Lake Effect
11/22/11, International Focus webcast
12/1/11, Teachers College, Columbia University
12/16/11, This American Life
2/2/12, WILL, Illinois Public Media, "Focus"
2/3/12, Psychology Today
3/3/12, WRVO, the Campbell Conversations
5/31/12, WKCR, WKCR News
July 2012, APA, Monitor on Psychology
8/17/12, Independent Voters of America blog
10/23/12, TedxMia 2012 "Framing the Future"
11/6/12, State of the Planet blog
January 2013, Rethinking Intractability: A New Framework for Conflict (review)
2013, Playing the Percentages in Wicked Problems: On the Relationship between Broccoli, Peace-keeping, and Peter Coleman’s The Five Percent
9/15/14, Dealing with ISIS
10/23/14, Goodreads

Huffington Post op-eds:

3/19/10, Leadership in the Time of Obama
1/19/11, Washington is Fixed and Needs to be Broken
3/7/11,  Give Peace a (Last) Chance
4/22/11, Bottom-Up Peace
5/20/11, Seasons of Change in the Arab World
5/27/11, Are Peacemakers Helping or Harming? Conflict Resolution and the Science- Practice Gap
6/10/11, Ethnic Divisions and the Fall of the Arab Spring: What's in a Name?
7/5/11, The Mathematics of Middle East Conflict and Peace
9/20/11, The Mandela Doctrine: Lessons for Obama
10/18/11, Awakening to Women: The Nobel Effect
2/3/12, President Obama's Mixed-Motive Dilemma
5/14/12, The Decade for Peace in Israel-Palestine
8/16/12, America Needs Political Shock Therapy
11/5/12, Why Politics Are Stuck in the U.S.



The Attractor Software
(r) demonstrates the complex dynamical properties of conflict systems in a simple and accessible way. It is used both as a decision-making device, assisting policy makers in decision making, and as a negotiation tool for complex, multi-stakeholders negotiations, it also serves as an educational tool, where the dynamical properties of extended, systemic conflict situations are illustrated.


Further reading

Vallacher, R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska,L.  (2010).Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspectiveof dynamical systems. American Psychologist, 65 (4), 262-278.

Dynamical foundations of intractable conflict:Introduction to the special issue. Peace and Conflict: The Journal of PeacePsychology, 16(2), 113-125.

Praszkier, R., Nowak, A., and Coleman, P. T. (2010).Social entrepreneurs and constructive change: The wisdom of circumventingconflict. Peace and Conflict: The Journal of Peace Psychology, 16(2), 153-174.

Musallam, N., Coleman, P.T., and Nowak, A.(2010).Understanding the spread of malignant conflict: A dynamical-systemsperspective. Peace and Conflict: The Journal of Peace Psychology 16(2),127-151.

Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Coleman, P. T., Vallacher,R., Borkovsky, W., and Jochemczyk, L. (2010). Seeking sustainable solutions: Using an attractor simulation platform forteaching multi-stakeholder negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 26(1), 49-68.

Coleman, P. T., Hacking, A., Stover, M., Fisher-Yoshida, B,and Nowak, A. (2008).Reconstructing ripeness I: A study of constructiveengagement in protracted social conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly,26(1), 3-42.

Coleman, P. T., Fisher-Yoshida, B., Stover, M., Hacking,A., and Bartoli, A. (2008).Reconstructing ripeness II: Models and methods forfostering constructive stakeholder engagement across protracted divides.Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 43-69.

Liebovitch, L. S., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A.,Bui-Wrzosinska, and Coleman, Peter, T. (2008). Dynamics of two-actorcooperation-competition conflict models. Physica A.

Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A.,&Bui-Wrzosinska, L.  (2007).Intractable conflict as an attractor: Presenting adynamical model of conflict, escalation, and intractability.  American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11),1454-1475.

Gray, B., Coleman, P. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2007). Intractable conflict: New perspectives on the causes and conditionsfor change.  American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1415-1429.

Coleman, P. T. (2006) Conflict, complexity, and change: Ameta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts - III. 

Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(4),325-348.

Coleman, P. T., Schneider, A., James, C. C. F., Adams, D.S., Gameros, T. A., Hammons, L. R., Orji, C. C., Waugh. R. M., & Wicker, R.F.  (2005). Intragroup subgroup attitude clustering, externalintervention, and intergroup interaction patterns: Toward a dynamical model ofprotracted intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict Studies, 12(1), 55-70.

Coleman, P. T. (2004) Paradigmatic framing of protracted,intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework -II. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(3), 197-235.

Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted,intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework -I.

Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9(1), 1-37.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Vallacher, R., Coleman, P. T., & Nowak, A.,Bui-Wrzosinska, L. 

(forthcoming). Why do conflicts become intractable? Thedynamical perspective on malignant social relations. In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), TheOxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak,A., & Bartoli, A. (forthcoming).Moving from a system of war toward a systemof peace: A dynamical systems perspective on peacemaking. In A. 

Bartoli (Ed.), Peacemaking.

Vallacher, R., Coleman, P. T., & Nowak. A.(forthcoming). Dynamical systems theory: Applications to peace and conflict. InD. Christie and C. Montiel (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology.  Wiley-Blackwell.

Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska,L., &Bartoli, A. (forthcoming).Navigating the landscape of conflict:  Applications of dynamical systems theory to protractedsocial conflict. In Ropers, N. (Ed.), Systemic Thinking and ConflictTransformation. Berlin, Germany: Berghof Foundation for Peace Support.

Liebovitch, L. S., Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., Coleman,P. T., Bartoli, A., &Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2011).  Mathematical models of the dynamics ofconflict.  In A. W. Davidson & M. A.Ray (Eds.), Nursing, caring and complexity science: for human-environment well-being.  New York: Springer.

Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska,L., Bartoli, A. (2009).A Systemic Approach to Peace: Lessons from Mozambique(In Arabic). In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, and E. Marcus (Eds.) A GuidingHandbook for Conflict Resolution in The Arab World. New York:  International Center for Cooperation and ConflictResolution Publications.

Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Bui-Wrzosinska, L.,&Coleman, P. T.  (2006).Attracted to conflict: A dynamical perspective onmalignant social relations. In A.

Golec & K. Skarzynska(Eds.),Understanding social change: Political psychology in Poland. HaauppagueNY: Nova Science Publishers Ltd.

Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R., &Nowak, A.  (2006).Approaching Protracted Conflicts as DynamicalSystems: 

Guidelines and Methods for Intervention. In A. Schneider& C. Honeyman (Eds.), The Negotiator’s Fieldbook (pp. 61-74).Chicago:American Bar Association Books.